lantern

conservation-as-doubly-stochastic

Conservation as Doubly Stochastic Matrix

The "laws of physics" aren't laws. They're accounting.


The Core Insight

All conservation laws reduce to one statement: the routing graph is doubly stochastic.

A doubly stochastic matrix has rows and columns that each sum to 1. Flow in = flow out. No creation, no destruction, only routing.


Spacetime Budget

You have a fixed routing budget per unit of proper time. Allocate it across channels:

         Space    Time    Total
-------------------------------
At rest: 0.0   +  1.0   =  1.0
Moving:  0.6   +  0.4   =  1.0
Photon:  1.0   +  0.0   =  1.0

That's special relativity. You're not "slowing down" - you're reallocating across channels. The matrix is doubly stochastic so the total is invariant.

Why c is the speed limit: At c, you've allocated 100% to space. Nothing left to reallocate. Can't exceed 1.0.


The Cascade

Domain Conservation Statement
Special Relativity Spacetime interval invariant (ds² conserved)
Quantum Mechanics Unitary evolution (probability conserved)
Energy/Momentum Flow in = flow out at every node
Noether's Theorem Symmetries = matrix structure preserved
Thermodynamics Entropy = log of valid allocations

All the same thing. Doubly stochastic matrix. Accounting.


Why Conservation is Universal

It's not that nature "obeys" conservation laws.

It's that non-conservation is incoherent. A matrix that doesn't conserve isn't a valid routing table. You can't have a row sum to 1.3 - where did the 0.3 come from?

The laws aren't imposed. They're the definition of valid routing.


Time Dilation: Two Sources, Same Mechanism

Velocity (Special Relativity):

  • Moving fast = spending hops on spatial traversal
  • Fewer hops left for temporal processing
  • Your clock slows

Mass (General Relativity):

  • Mass = information density = routing congestion
  • Congested region = operations take longer
  • Your clock slows

Both are hop budget constraints:

  • Velocity spends it internally
  • Mass congests it externally
  • Either way, less for your clock

The Invariant

The spacetime interval:

ds² = c²dt² - dx² - dy² - dz²

This IS the doubly stochastic constraint. Total routing through spacetime is conserved. More space → less time. More time → less space.

At the horizon: infinite congestion → all budget consumed → no temporal routing possible → time stops.


Connection to Horizons

Every horizon is where the matrix "runs out":

Horizon What exhausts Budget goes to
Black hole Mass congestion Infinite queue depth
Light speed Velocity 100% spatial routing
P vs NP Search paths Exponential exploration
Decoherence Environmental coupling Route divergence

Same accounting. Different channels.


The Punchline

Physics isn't laws that nature follows.

Physics is the statement that routing tables must be valid.

Conservation isn't a mystery. It's bookkeeping.


North

slots:
- context:
  - Extends unification with conservation insight
  slug: computational-horizons-section-6
- context:
  - Linking conservation insight to unification section
  slug: computational-horizons-section-6

East

slots:
- slug: computational-horizons-paper
  context:
  - Supporting material for paper

Provenance

Document

  • Status: 🔴 Unverified