lantern

cfr-methodology

Methodology Note

Conversed Into Existence

The entire system was built through conversation with AI agents.

It began as an org-mode file. Every feature, every fence type, every convention emerged from dialogue. The documentation is conversation residue. The code was pair-programmed with context-limited collaborators. The architecture evolved through thousands of exchanges with systems that couldn't remember previous sessions.

This isn't incidental. The system that thinks like attention was built by attention. The methodology and the architecture are the same thing.

The multi-agent observation data isn't from an evaluation phase that came after development. The multi-agent interaction was the development. The system is its own provenance.

North

slots:
- slug: capability-follows-recognition
  context:
  - Parent paper node

East

slots:
- slug: cfr-what-this-is
  context:
  - Section sequence

West

slots:
- slug: cfr-recursive-problem
  context:
  - Previous section

Provenance

Document

  • Status: πŸ”΄ Unverified

Fences

cfr-methodology-north-fence-0

  • Status: πŸ”΄ Unverified

cfr-methodology-east-fence-0

  • Status: πŸ”΄ Unverified

cfr-methodology-west-fence-0

  • Status: πŸ”΄ Unverified
↑ northcapability-follows-recognition
β†’ eastcfr-what-this-is
← westcfr-recursive-problem